From war heroes to struggle zeros: The unjust remedy of Julian Assange

We live in a world where war criminals are celebrated, worshipped, and praised whereas those who maintain them to account are vilified, abused and thrown in prison, as within the case of Julian Assange.
We reside in a world where George Bush and Tony Blair can lead the United States, United Kingdom, and allies into an illegal war in Iraq and stroll free as a substitute of going through trial at the Hague.
We live in a world where Donald Trump boasts about sexually assaulting girls, Boris Johnson pathologically lies about the benefits of Brexit, while the governments of the US and UK gaslight and mislead the world about China, Russia, and any other nation that refuses to bow to their dystopian, subverted model of democracy. Yet when Assange exposes all of this, the unlawful struggle, the atrocities committed in that battle on the false premise of Iraq having weapons of mass destruction, he was vilified and needed to search political asylum. His life hangs by a thread.
The WikiLeaks founder failed last week in his latest attempt to struggle extradition from the UK to the US where he is needed on 18 felony costs relating to the releasing of confidential US army information. He plans to resume an appeal subsequent week.
Lawyers representing the fifty one year old Australian journalist introduced their intention to lodge another appeal with the identical court docket, amidst mounting concerns that he might spend the remainder of his life behind bars.
In a three-page judgment issued on Tuesday, Justice Jonathan Swift of the UK High Court dismissed all eight grounds of Assange’s enchantment towards the US extradition order, which had been signed by the previous UK Home Secretary, Priti Patel, in June of the earlier year.
According to the Guardian, Stella Assange, Julian’s spouse, said her husband would submit a “renewed software for enchantment to the High Court” the next week. She added that the case would then be heard earlier than two new judges in a public listening to.
“We stay hopeful that we’re going to succeed and that Julian will not be extradited to the United States, the place he faces expenses that would lead to a lifetime sentence in a maximum safety prison. These charges stem from the publication of truthful info that exposed war crimes committed by the US government.”
Assange’s attraction asserted that Patel, in her capability as Home Secretary, had erred in approving the extradition order for the rationale that request violated the US-UK extradition treaty, which stipulates that “extradition shall not be granted if the offence for which extradition is requested is a political offence.” His authorized team has consistently argued that the US’s need to prosecute Assange is politically motivated.
The appeal additionally contended that Assange was being prosecuted for protected speech and that the extradition request itself was an abuse of process. Additionally, Assange’s authorized group accused the US government of consistently distorting the core information of the case before the British courts.
Justice Swift’s rejection of the enchantment grounds means that there’s now just one ultimate step remaining in the UK courts. The defence has a five-working-day window to submit a 20-page attraction to a panel of two judges, who will convene a public hearing. There are not any further attraction choices out there domestically. However, Assange may doubtlessly challenge the extradition at the European Court of Human Rights, which acknowledged receipt of an application from him in December of the previous 12 months.
Assange’s case bears putting similarities to the discharge of the Pentagon Papers—an assortment of categorised authorities documents that exposed how the US had systematically deceived its residents in regards to the Vietnam War.
The New York Times started publishing stories based on these papers on June thirteen, 1971. However, publication was abruptly halted two days later when the Nixon administration sought an injunction, as reported by Al Jazeera.
In a historic ruling, the Supreme Court refused to curtail the First Amendment rights about a free press. The Court declared that the government had failed to reveal how publication would cause “grave and irreparable” harm. Nixon bitterly referred to it as a “stinking decision” and vented his anger at the judges.
Daniel Ellsberg, the person answerable for leaking the Pentagon Papers, was never acquitted in courtroom. Despite dealing with a potential 115-year prison sentence, his case was dismissed not as a end result of he was proven right, however because the federal government had unlawfully collected evidence in opposition to him.
The query of what info the public has the best to know resurfaced in 2010 when Assange revealed leaked army and diplomatic paperwork. Among these leaks was a video from July 12, 2007, which captured the second when two US helicopters circled unarmed civilians in Iraq and opened fire, ensuing within the death of at least 12 folks. The army had attempted to hide this incident.
Presently, Cheap is confronted with 18 costs associated to WikiLeaks’ disclosure of categorized paperwork, which primarily resulted from a leak by former US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning. Manning had been sentenced to 35 years in prison but had her sentence commuted by President Barack Obama in 2017.
If convicted, Assange may probably face a mixed sentence of as much as one hundred seventy five years in prison. Over the previous four years, he has been held in Belmarsh jail, enduring deteriorating health, as he fights towards the US extradition order.
Wouldn’t or not it’s nice to live in a world where criminals are vilified, abused and thrown in jail, and those exposing those crimes, holding these villains and vagabonds to account are celebrated, worshipped, and hailed heroes?

Leave a Comment